NYC Council Candidates Get FIERCE
Thursday September 10, 2009 | New York City
In an August 28 Friday Forum hosted by FIERCE, a Chelsea-based
advocacy group for LGBTQ youth of color, District 3 City Council
candidate Yetta Kurland repeatedly signaled her personal identification
with the struggles those young people face.
One of her
opponents, Maria Passannante-Derr, who has at times clashed with the
group in her role on Community Board 2, voiced her respect for FIERCE’s
goals, even as she challenged them to aggressively seize opportunities
already available to impact policy debates.
The third candidate
in the race, City Council Speaker Christine Quinn, who has served the
district, which runs from the West Village north to Chelsea and Hell’s
Kitchen, since 1999, did not attend, citing a scheduling conflict.
FIERCE,
the Fabulous Independent Educated Radicals for Community Empowerment,
focused the discussion on its ongoing efforts to preserve and enhance
the West Village and the Hudson River piers in Lower Manhattan as safe
havens for LGBTQ youth, many of whom travel from other parts of the
city and region to socialize openly with their peers. The questions,
posed by FIERCE members Elegost Rosado and Chris Baez, probed the
candidates’ views on tensions between youth, on one side, and
neighborhood residents and police, on the other, and on recurring
debates about expanding the hours, access, and services available for
young people on the piers.
An out lesbian who mentioned she is
41, Kurland, a civil rights attorney, established from the start
simpatico with fellow LGBTQ community members roughly a generation
younger. As part of its effort to embrace youth of varying gender
identities, FIERCE typically asks speakers at its events to state their
“preferred gender pronoun” or PGP, by which they wish to be identified.
Passannante-Derr, also an attorney, was initially caught off-guard by
the question, saying she wanted to be called “Maria.” Prompted again,
she said that “her” is her PGP. Kurland answered the same question by
saying audience members could apply any gender identification to her
they wished, adding later, “I am in a lot of ways gender-nonconforming.”
Passannante-Derr,
at other points, was proactive in embracing goals in line with FIERCE’s
agenda, calling for an inspector general in the public schools to
investigate harassment and discrimination against queer students,
saying she “firmly believes” any redevelopment approved at Houston
Street’s Pier 40 will include a 24-hour drop-in center for LGBTQ young
people, and pledging that if elected to the Council she would make
discretionary “member item” money available to the group.
Kurland
seconded her rival’s commitment on Pier 40, and on many broad policy
questions, the two candidates largely hit the same notes. Many of their
differences emerged when they got down to specifics. On several
occasions, Kurland emphasized two leading themes of her campaign — that
choices need not be made between polarized options and that public
decision-making must be more open and transparent. Speaking to the
simmering tensions in recent years between LGBTQ youth of color and
more affluent and less racially diverse neighborhood residents, she
said, “I want to find a way for us to dialogue better with the greater
community. I think we’ve been put into a false dichotomy where it’s the
bad kids versus the bad community residents, and I don’t think that
really exists, and the way we’re going to do that is to roll up our
shirtsleeves, with respect for all of us.”
At the same time,
Kurland argued, the procedures in place for approving how land
regulated by the city, such as the piers, can be used — governed by the
Uniform Land Use Review Procedure, or ULURP — disenfranchises certain
portions of the community, in this case, the FIERCE constituency. “The
ULURP system that happens now often times excludes community
involvement,” she said. “We need to find creative ways to bring
everyone to the table.”
Passannante-Derr took great exception to
Kurland’s assertion. “I disagree with your first statement that the
ULURP process is not all-inclusive of the community,” she said,
pointing out that approval is generally an eight-month effort that
involves numerous levels and agencies of government, all of them open
to public input. Expressing her confidence that a 24-hour drop-in
center at Pier 40 could and should result from the process, she said,
“With your support and your participation, at the board, at the borough
president level, at city planning, and the City Council, that will
happen. But you have to be at the hearings with your testimony… It’s a
lot of work.”
FIERCE challenged Passannante-Derr to explain why,
during the debate several years ago about the Christopher Street pier’s
curfew, she supported the relocation of the LGBTQ night scene to Pier
54 at West 13th Street, which the group said was out of the way, less
safe, and inherently a temporary fix, given the likelihood of
redevelopment there. The candidate responded that the proposal “was not
in any way disrespectful,” but rather aimed at opening up space for
young people wishing to stay out later than 1 a.m. Ending discussion of
the topic in something of a stalemate, Passannante-Derr said, “If it’s
still unacceptable, I’d like to know why it’s still unacceptable.”
But
when asked about opportunities for making more affordable food
available at Pier 45, just above Christopher Street, Passannante-Derr
laid responsibility back at FIERCE’s feet. “Why don’t you start
something down there?” she asked. Then, recalling that the group is a
non-profit, she added, “Maybe you could have a separate, for-profit
organization that would provide food down on Pier 45.”
Desireé
Marshall, the evening’s “referee,” read an email from Quinn, expressing
her regret at missing the event and recalling efforts her office had
worked on with FIERCE in recent years. Kurland, in turn, used regretful
tones in noting the Council speaker’s absence. “I am saddened that she
is not here,” she said of Quinn. “LGBTQ youth have been ignored for too
long. And you deserve to have all three of the candidates here tonight…
We need our elected officials listening better.”
Passannante-Derr
passed on that chance to swipe at Quinn, but later said, “Years ago I
supported Chris. I thought she was a reformer.”
Online version available at Gay City News.